Jump forward to the present day and I was filling in the gaps in my records using the Scottish Civil BMD Registrations found on FamilySearch and available for viewing at the Family History Centers and their affiliates and what did I see recorded as the informant of David Murduch, John Smith Murdoch's son, birth? You guessed it...William Innes, David's uncle.
I started off with a few assumptions about William Innes:
- He was about the same age as John Smith Murdoch, plus 15 or minus 5 years1
- He married either a Murdoch or Shaw2
- He resided in Glasgow itself or in Lanarkshire around 18583
- He resided in Glasgow or at least in Lanarkshire in the 1851 census4
I did come across a William Innes married to a Janet in the 1851 census of Scotland residing at 97 Saltmarket Street in Glasgow.
1851 census of Scotland, Royal Burgh of Glasgow, Parish of St. Andrews, enumeration district (ED) 15, page 1, schedule no. 1, William Innes; FHL microfilm 1,042,436. |
- William appears to have been born about 1815 making him 13 years older than John Smith Murdoch.
- He resides in Glasgow in 1851
- It isn't a Margaret but this Janet could be a Shaw.
William's daughter, Janet, was born before civil registration started so I have to rely on the Old Parish Registers available on ScotlandsPeople and also on FamilySearch. Since I'm being frugal it was back to my local Family History Center to look up the record.
Parish of Glasgow (Lanarkshire, Scotland), "Registration District 644," baptism of Janet Innes, 28 Sep 1845; FHL microfilm 102,921. |
This is where luck is very, very important. I searched for Janet Innes on ScotlandPeople to learn when she died5. Assuming she is Helen Shaw's sister then I already know that Helen's parents are John Shaw and Janet White/Whyte.
Screen capture from ScotlandPeople for a search of the death of a Janet Innes started from 1851 with a birth year 1819 +/- 5 years. |
This looks to be the right Janet Innes. She is a wife of a spirit merchant and the daughter of John Shaw and Janet Whyte. However, she died at 93 Saltmarket Street. That's only 2 doors down from the address in the 1851 census.
This is where the Scottish Post Office Directories becomes your friend. I started with the 1851-52 post-office directory for Glasgow and looked for Saltmarket Street.
What about a possible marriage for William Innes and Janet Shaw? That, as they say, is problematic. I've found an 1840 marriage for a Janet Shaw to a William James or Innes within the FamilySearch indexes for the OPRs and the image confirms that it might be James or Innes for William's surname but his occupation is a baker. Unfortunately the church register doesn't record the names of her parents.
I did come across the death of a William Innes, a spirit merchant, on 13 Jul 1858 at 93 Saltmarket Street. If I had been willing to spend a few pounds I could have viewed the documents pertaining to his will and administration on ScotlandsPeople. Additionally, I might have checked out the "Scotland, Lanark, Glasgow, Glasgow Sheriff Court, probate records" collection at my local Family History Center6.
Assuming that my research is good7 then it appears that William Innes didn't marry Margaret Murdoch but a Janet Shaw. Too bad that the line I'm researching is the Murdoch line. At least this is one mystery resolved.
1. Why 15 years? Why not? If William married Margaret Murdoch (born about 1826) he could be older than Margaret by a decade or more. 15 years just sounded right as a starting point.
2. To be a brother-in-law and an uncle to the same family William had to have married either Margaret Murdoch, John Smith Murdoch's older sister, or a sister of Helen Shaw.
3. Since he is an informant he probably lived near to the John Smith Murdoch family and they resided in Glasgow.
4. This is a stretch but I had to limit the scope of my searching somehow. Helen Shaw and Margaret Murdoch were both born in the Glasgow area so I figured they were married there also.
5. I know, I'm not supposed to spend money on this research endeavor. However, searching ScotlandsPeople is free. It is only getting the images that costs you money.
6. That is for the new year I think.
7. I haven't recorded all the paths I took to get here in order to eliminate other possible people.